References

Anderson, Steve, and Tara McPherson. 2011. “Engaging Digital Scholarship: Thoughts on Evaluating Multimedia Scholarship.” Profession, 136–151. https://doi.org/prof.2011.2011.1.136.

Andrews, Tara L. 2012. “The Third Way: Philology and Critical Edition in the Digital Age.” Variants 10: 61–76. https://www.academia.edu/attachments/30526561/download_file.

Antonijević, Smiljana. 2015. Amongst Digital Humanists: An Ethnographic Study of Digital Knowledge Production. Palgrave Macmillan.

Baldridge, Jason. 2015. “It’s Okay for Academic Software to Suck.” Personal Blog. Java Code Geeks (blog). May 12, 2015. https://www.javacodegeeks.com/2015/05/its-okay-for-academic-software-to-suck.html.

Basken, Paul. 2017. “Job-Killing Computerization Sets Its Sights on the University Researcher.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, February 20, 2017, sec. Research. https://www.chronicle.com/article/Job-Killing-Computerization/239248.

Berry, David M. 2014. Critical Theory and the Digital. Critical Theory and Contemporary Society. New York, London, New Delhi etc.: Bloomsbury Academic.

Betti, Arianna. 2015. Against Facts. Cambridge Massachusetts, London England: MIT Press.

Bostrom, Nick. 2016. Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bowker, Geoffrey C., and Susan Leigh Star. 1999. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England: The MIT Press.

Braithwaite, Reginald. 2013. “Defactoring.” Personal Blog/Repository of Essays. Reginald Braithwaite: Via Raganwald.Com (blog). 2013. http://raganwald.com/2013/10/08/defactoring.html.

Broadwell, P., and Timothy R. Tangherlini. 2012. “TrollFinder: Geo-Semantic Exploration of a Very Large Corpus of Danish Folklore.” In Proceedings of LREC. Istanbul, Turkey.

Buitinck, L., G. Louppe, M. Blondel, F. Pedregosa, A. Mueller, O. Grisel, V. Niculae, et al. 2013. “API Design for Machine Learning Software: Experiences from the Scikit-Learn Project.” ArXiv E-Prints, September. https://arxiv.org/abs/1309.0238.

Buckheit, J., and D.L. Donoho. 1995. “Wavelab and Reproducible Research.” In Wavelets and Statistics, edited by A. Antoniadis, 55–81. New York, NY: Springer. https://statweb.stanford.edu/~wavelab/Wavelab_850/wavelab.pdf.

Burgess, Helen J., and Jeanne Hamming. 2011. “New Media in Academy: Labor and the Production of Knowledge in Scholarly Multimedia.” DHQ: Digital Humanities Quarterly 5 (3). http://digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/5/3/000102/000102.html.

Cerquiglini, Bernard. 1999. In Praise of the Variant: A Critical History of Philology. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Chalmers, Melissa K., and Paul N. Edwards. 2017. “Producing ‘One Vast Index’: Google Book Search as an Algorithmic System.” Big Data & Society 4 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717716950.

Clement, Tanya E. 2016. “Where Is Methodology in Digital Humanities?” In Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016, 153–75. University of Minnesota Press. http://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/debates/text/65.

Dalen-Oskam, Karina van, and Joris J. van Zundert. 2007. “Delta for Middle Dutch: Author and Copyist Distinction in ‘Walewein.’” Literary and Linguistic Computing 22 (3): 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqm012.

DeRose, Steven J., David G. Durand, Elli Mylonas, and Allen H. Renear.

1. “What Is Text, Really?” Journal of Computing in Higher Education 1 (2): 3–26.

Drucker, Johanna. 2011. “Humanities Approaches to Graphical Display.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 5 (1). http://digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/5/1/000091/000091.html.

Enderle, Jonathan Scott. 2016. “A Plot of Brownian Noise.” GitHub Personal Code Repository. Jonathan Scott Enderle (blog). July 18,

1. https://github.com/senderle/svd-noise/blob/master/Noise.ipynb.

Enderle, Scott. 2015. “What’s a Sine Wave of Sentiment?” Personal Blog. The Frame of Lagado (blog). April 2, 2015. http://www.lagado.name/blog/sine-of-the-times/.

Ford, Paul. 2015. “What Is Code?” Businessweek, June 11, 2015. http://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2015-paul-ford-what-is-code/.

Frabetti, Federica. 2012. “Have the Humanities Always Been Digital?” In Understanding Digital Humanities, 161–171. London; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Gabler, Hans Walter. 1995. “Introduction: Textual Criticism and Theory in Modern German Editing.” In Contemporary German Editorial Theory, edited by Hans Walter Gabler, George Bornstein, and Gillian Borland Pierce, 1–16. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. https://www.academia.edu/856505/Textual_Criticism_and_Theory_in_Modern_German_Editing.

Galey, Alan. 2010. “The Human Presence in Digital Artifacts.” In Text and Genre in Reconstruction: Effects of Digitalization on Ideas, Behaviors, Products and Institutions, edited by Willard McCarty, 93–118. Cambridge (UK): Open Book Publishers. http://individual.utoronto.ca/alangaley/files/publications/Galey_Human.pdf.

Gitelman, Lisa, ed. 2013. “Raw Data” Is an Oxymoron. Cambridge (MA), USA: The MIT Press.

Goldfarb, Charles F. 1996. “The Roots of SGML – A Personal Recollection.” 1996. http://www.sgmlsource.com/history/roots.htm.

Grusin, Richard. 1994. “What Is an Electronic Author? Theory and the Technological Fallacy.” Configurations 2 (3): 469–83. https://doi.org/10.1353/con.1994.0039.

Hiller, Moritz. 2015. “Signs o’ the Times: The Software of Philology and a Philology of Software.” Digital Culture and Society 1 (1): 152–163. https://doi.org/10.14361/dcs-2015-0110.

Hinsen, Konrad. 2017. “Sustainable Software and Reproducible Research: Dealing with Software Collapse.” Personal Academic Blog. Konrad Hinsen’s Blog (blog). January 13, 2017. http://blog.khinsen.net/posts/2017/01/13/sustainable-software-and-reproducible-research-dealing-with-software-collapse/.

Jockers, Matthew L. 2013. Macroanalysis: Digital Methods and Literary History. Urabana, Chicago, Springfield: UI Press.

———. 2014. “A Novel Method for Detecting Plot.” Matthew L. Jockers (blog). June 5, 2014. http://www.matthewjockers.net/2014/06/05/a-novel-method-for-detecting-plot/#note1.

———. 2015. “Revealing Sentiment and Plot Arcs with the Syuzhet Package.” Matthew L. Jockers (blog). February 2, 2015. http://www.matthewjockers.net/2015/02/02/syuzhet/.

Jones, Steven E. 2014. The Emergence of the Digital Humanities. New York, London: Routledge.

———. 2016. Roberto Busa, S.J., and the Emergence of Humanities Computing: The Priest and the Punched Cards. New York, London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Kay, Alan C. 1993. “The Early History of Smalltalk.” ACM SIGPLAN Notices 28 (3): 69–95. https://doi.org/10.1145/155360.155364.

Kestemont, M., S. Moens, and J. Deploige. 2015. “Collaborative Authorship in the Twelfth Century: A Stylometric Study of Hildegard of Bingen and Guibert of Gembloux.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 30 (2): 199–224. https://doi.org/10.1093/LLC/FQT063.

Kestemont, Mike, Guy de Pauw, Renske van Nie, and Walter Daelemans.

1. “Lemmatization for Variation-Rich Languages Using Deep Learning.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 32 (4): 797–815. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqw034.

Kirschenbaum, M. G. (2008). Mechanisms: New Media and the Forensic Imagination. The MIT Press.

Kittler, Friedrich. 1993. “Es gibt keine Software.” In Draculas Vermächtmis, 225–242. Leipzig: Reclam Verlag.

Knuth, Donald E. 1984. “Literate Programming.” The Computer Journal 27 (1): 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/27.2.97.

Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Translated by Catherine Porter. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Manovich, Lev. 2013. Software Takes Command. Vol. 5. International Texts in Critical Media Aesthestics. New York, London, New Delhi etc.: Bloomsbury Academic.

Marino, Mark C. 2006. “Critical Code Studies.” Electronic Book Review, December. http://www.electronicbookreview.com/thread/electropoetics/codology.

McPherson, Tara. 2012. “Why Are the Digital Humanities So White? Or Thinking the Histories of Race and Computation.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities, edited by Matthew K. Gold, 139–60. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. http://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/debates/text/29.

Metz, Sandi, and Katrina Owen. 2016. 99 Bottles of OOP. Potato Canyon Software, LLC.

Morozov, Evgeny. 2013. To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. New York: PublicAffairs.

Nowviskie, Bethany. 2011. “Where Credit Is Due: Preconditions for the Evaluation of Collaborative Digital Scholarship.” Profession, no. 6: 169–181. https://doi.org/prof.2011.2011.1.169.

Nyhan, Julianne, and Andrew Flinn. 2016. Computation and the Humanities: Towards an Oral History of Digital Humanities. Springer Series on Cultural Computing. Cham (CH): Springer Open. http://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319201696.

Perez, Fernando, and Brian E. Granger. 2015. “Project Jupyter: Computational Narratives as the Engine of Collaborative Data Science.” Project Jupyter: Interactive Computing (blog). July 7, 2015. http://blog.jupyter.org/2015/07/07/project-jupyter-computational-narratives-as-the-engine-of-collaborative-data-science/.

Pilgrim, Mark. 2009. Dive into Pyhton 3. New York: Apress. http://www.diveintopython3.net/.

Piper, Andrew. 2015. “Novel Devotions: Conversional Reading, Computational Modeling, and the Modern Novel.” New Literary History 46 (1): 63–98. https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2015.0008.

Presner, Todd. 2012. “How to Evaluate Digital Scholarship.” Journal of Digital Humanities 1 (4). http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/1-4/how-to-evaluate-digital-scholarship-by-todd-presner/.

Purdy, James P., and Joyce R. Walker. 2010. “Valuing Digital Scholarship: Exploring the Changing Realities of Intellectual Work.” Profession, 177–195. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41419875.

Ramsay, Stephen. 2011. Reading Machines: Toward an Algorithmic Criticism (Topics in the Digital Humanities). Chicago (US): University of Illinois Press.

Rockwell, Geoffrey. 2011. “On the Evaluation of Digital Media as Scholarship.” Profession, 152–168. https://doi.org/prof.2011.2011.1.152.

Rybicki, J., D. Hoover, and M. Kestemont. 2014. “Collaborative Authorship: Conrad, Ford and Rolling Delta.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 29 (3): 422–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqu016.

Sahle, Patrick, and Georg Vogeler. 2014. “Criteria for Reviewing Scholarly Digital Editions (Version 1.1).” Institutional Website. Institut Für Dokumentologie Und Editorik. June 2014. http://www.i-d-e.de/publikationen/weitereschriften/criteria-version-1-1/.

Sandvig, Christian. 2015. “Seeing the Sort: The Aesthetic and Industrial Defense of ‘The Algorithm.’” Media-N 11 (1): 35–51. http://median.newmediacaucus.org/art-infrastructures-information/seeing-the-sort-the-aesthetic-and-industrial-defense-of-the-algorithm/.

Schreibman, Susan, Laura Mandell, and Stephen Olsen. 2011. “Introduction.” Profession, no. 6: 123–201. https://doi.org/10.1632/prof.2011.2011.1.123.

Seaver, Nick. 2014. “On Reverse Engineering: Looking for the Cultural Work of Engineers.” Collaborative Blog. Medium (blog). January 28, 2014. https://medium.com/anthropology-and-algorithms/on-reverse-engineering-d9f5bae87812.

Senseney, Megan. 2016. “Pace of Change: A Preliminary YesWorkflow Case Study.” Technical Report 201601–1. Urbana: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/88856/Senseney_YW_PaceofChange_CaseStudy.pdf?sequence=2.

Smithies, James. 2012. “Evaluating Scholarly Digital Outputs: The Six Layers Approach.” Journal of Digital Humanities 1 (4). http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/1-4/evaluating-scholarly-digital-outputs-by-james-smithies/.

Swafford, Joanna. 2016. “Messy Data and Faulty Tools.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities, edited by Matthew K. Gold and Lauren F. Klein,

1. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. http://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/debates/text/100.

Underwood, Ted. 2013. “The Imaginary Conflicts Disciplines Create.” Personal Academic Blog. The Stone and the Shell (blog). December 14, 2013. https://tedunderwood.com/2013/12/14/the-imaginary-conflicts-disciplines-create/.

———. 2014. “Understanding Genre in a Collection of a Million Volumes, Interim Report.” Research archive. Figshare. December 29, 2014. https://figshare.com/articles/Understanding_Genre_in_a_Collection_of_a_Million_Volumes_Interim_Report/1281251.

———. 2015a. “Paceofchange: Initial Release; Version Used in Article.” Zenodo, 31 December 2015. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.44226.

———. 2015b. “The Literary Uses of High-Dimensional Space.” Big Data & Society 2 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715602494.

———. 2018. “Paceofchange: Initial Release; Version Used in Article.” Github Repository, last commit: 18 April 2018. https://github.com/tedunderwood/paceofchange.

Underwood, Ted, and Jordan Sellers. 2014. “Page-Level Genre Metadata for English-Language Volumes in HathiTrust, 1700–1922.” Research archive. Figshare. 2014. https://figshare.com/articles/Page_Level_Genre_Metadata_for_English_Language_Volumes_in_HathiTrust_1700_1922/1279201.

———. 2015. “How Quickly Do Literary Standards Change?” Research archive. Figshare. 2015. http://figshare.com/articles/How_Quickly_Do_Literary_Standards_Change_/1418394.

———. 2016. “The ~Longue Durée~ of Literary Prestige.” Modern Language Quarterly 77 (3): 321–344. https://doi.org/10.1215/00267929-3570634.

Vee, Annette. 2013. “Understanding Computer Programming as a Literacy.” LiCS 1 (2): 42–64. http://licsjournal.org/OJS/index.php/LiCS/article/view/24/26.

Welch, Andrew. 2010. “Text, Image, Book: Reading William Blake — On Reading Blake’s ‘Milton’ in Particular.” Imagining William Blake (blog). December 5, 2010. https://imaginingwilliamblake.wordpress.com/2010/12/05/blake-milton/.

Zundert, Joris J. van. 2016. “Author, Editor, Engineer — Code & the Rewriting of Authorship in Scholarly Editing.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 40 (4): 349–375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2016.1165453.